3 Categories:
1. E+C=Maximum authority of Executive
Exec. acts pursuant to implicit/explicit authority of Congress
2. E without C= Middle authority of Executive
Exec. acts in the absence of either congressional grant or denial of authority & he relies on his independent or concurrent authority.
3. E – C= low/no authority of Executive
Exec. takes measures incompatible with the express/implied will of Congress, he can rely only on his own power minus the power of Congress over the matter.
This case is in the third group b/c there are 3 policies inconsistent w/ the seizure:
A is not valid b/c it allocates only the generic powers stated afterwards.
B is not valid b/c only Congress can declare war, a president that could have internal control b/c he committed forces elsewhere is alarming.
C is not valid b/c it is limited by 5th Amend (“no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property”)
? is not permissible b/c it implies an unchecked implied power. While this may be the case in time of necessity, not valid w/o statute expressing it.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Executive Power and are similar to What were the 3 categories on the concurrence of Jackson in the Steel Seizure Case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "What were the 3 categories on the concurrence of Jackson in the Steel Seizure Case?"