Q: Briefly explain the Political Question Doctrine.
Self imposed limitation on its power. Court declines to entertain issues that are political in nature.
Political question doctrine seems to be a mesh of 2 principles:
1. Separation of powers: as a constitutional matter, the court will not decide matters which it concludes are committed by the Constitution to other branches of govt for decision.
2. Prudential concerns: court concludes that it is unwise, even if not strictly unconstitutional, for it to decide.
Apportionment cases are justifiable under the 14th Amendment but not under the Guaranty Clause in Article IV – 4
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Judicial Review and are similar to Briefly explain the Political Question Doctrine.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding of the court in the Baker v. Carr (1962) case?
- Briefly outline the United States v. Klein (1871) case.
- Describe Patterson’s case of The First Amendment.
- Describe the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966).
- List the 6 factors that Brennan gives in order to make an issue a non-justiciable political question.
- What is meant by Congressional Control of Judicial Power?
- What is the Intent of Framers?
- What are the factors or issues considered to be political questions?
- Dred Scott v. Sanford
- Lawrence v. Texas Case Summary
What's Your Answer to "Briefly explain the Political Question Doctrine."