Q: Briefly outline The City of Rome v. United States (1980) case.
The City of Rome v. United States (1980) p. 24
The court held that Congress could prohibit electoral schemes with discriminatory effects even as the Court itself concluded on the same day that such schemes were not themselves violative of the 15th Amend.
Justice Marshall: the Act’s ban on electoral changes that are discriminatory in effect is an appropriate method of promoting the purposes of the 15th Amend…Congress could rationally have concluded that…it was proper to prohibit changes that have a discriminatory impact.
The court has continued to grapple with the reach of the congressional power under enforcement provisions of the Reconstruction Amendments in several other cases since Katzenbach v. Morgan.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to Briefly outline The City of Rome v. United States (1980) case.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- How did the court recognize far-reaching congressional remedial powers in Fullilove v. Klutznick(1980) case?
- Give a note on CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE AND EXPAND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
- Give a note on The Civil Rights Cases.
- What is meant by Congressional Control of Judicial Power?
- Describe the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966).
- Give a note on the outcome of the Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case?
- Give an account of the Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968) case.
- State 2 rules with respect to the Proper clause in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) case?
- Describe the Boerne v. Flores (1997) case.
- What was the holding in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) case?
What's Your Answer to "Briefly outline The City of Rome v. United States (1980) case."