Dangerous Products are hazardous materials that can cause harm to a person.
Injury by a defective or dangerous product gives an advantage when compared to injury by other things- one has an easier time recovering compensation because of the presence of certain special rules and theories of recovery in the field of product liability law.
Recoveries from such injuries are based on certain theories, primary ones being: strict liability; negligence; tortuous misinterpretation and, breach of warranty, depending on the law in the applicable state.
Product Liability means the seller or the manufacturer is held liable for placing a defective product in the hands of the consumer.
For these reasons law has introduced a doctrine known as strict liability so as to help injured people, due to defective or dangerous products, and allow them to recover compensation from the manufacturer or the seller without showing that they were actually negligent
Strict liability does not apply in cases when a consumer has purchased a product from places that sell various products and not just one type of product such as garage sale, thrift store.
Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts incorporated a provision that stated strict liability on the part of the manufacturer. It states, a manufacturer is liable for product or goods defect that occur during the manufacturing process not taking into consideration the level of care employed by the manufacturer. Courts later also include cases that do not involve errors in manufacturing, insufficient warnings about the product, in the strict liability cases.
The Restatement (Third) of Torts: Strict Liability rules are applicable to cases that involve errors in manufacturing and negligence rules for other type of product liability cases.
Under the theory of negligence a plaintiff must prove five basic elements:
In a product liability case, the law also sets standard of care to act as a framework at the time of manufacturing. Even after the plaintiff’s proof that the standards set were unmet, it cannot recover unless it proves the two-
A claim in the product liability case can be because of false information provided to the consumer rather than defective products. A person harmed because of this is said to recover from misinterpretation.
Tortuous misinterpretation appears in three basic forms:
Defenses to Product Liability
A defendant can fight on various points
|GleevecGuidant Defibrillator / Pacemaker||Crestor||Ketek|
|Lasik Eye Surgery||Lead Poisoning||Levitra|
MoisturePlus Contact Lens Solution
Motor Vehicle Defects
Ortho Evra Patch
Popcorn Lung Illness
ReNu with MoistureLoc
Silicosis & Silica
Spinach Recall and E. coli
Triaminic Vapor Patch