Dissent: disagrees w/interpretation of Young b/c it unnecessarily narrows it- it should be a straightforward test of 1)prospective & 2) ongoing violation of Fed law. Discussing state forum availability narrows doctrine, and & no need to address Fed interpretation. Otherwise it is a case-by-case analysis of several factors. A declaratory judgment is not the equivalent to granting title, so Young does not apply. Here the state would be divested of its regulatory powers.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the dissent in the Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Idaho (1997) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.