Loui v. Board of Medical Examiners:
a. Doctor hired an assistant and then attempted to rape her. He was convicted of attempted rape and kidnapping.
b. The Board reviewed him and suspended his license for a year. The doctor appealed the decision, calling it double jeopardy–punished twice for the same crime.
c. HELD: court said the suspension was not punishing him, but instead, giving him an opportunity to think about his behavior as a professional, and the potential response of the public. They are “re-teaching” him b/c the practice of medicine is not a right, but a privilege. If he was entitled to practice medicine as a right, then it may be more of a punishment. But this is not the case.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Health Care Law Cases and are similar to What were the facts in the case Loui v. Board of Medical Examiners?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "What were the facts in the case Loui v. Board of Medical Examiners?"