Facts: Male employees of CT state claimed that CT State Employment Retirement Act violated Title VII b/c of their sex. Lower court allowed claim b/c it was prospective & permissible according to Edelman.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What were the facts of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case to implicitly waive of sovereign immunity?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.