Q: What were the facts of Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S. (1935) case?
Facts: Involved President Roosevelt’s attempt to fire Fed Trade Commission
official. Court assumed constitutionality of independent agencies and ruled that
Congress has authority to limit President’s ability to remove an appointee, even
when the appointee’s power is partly executive in nature. The President’s power to
remove officers of independent agencies is not unlimited.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What were the facts of Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S. (1935) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- How does the President play a role in officers appointment?
- How is Removal of Officers done?
- What were the facts in the case Morrison v. Olsen (1988)?
- How is Appointment of Officers done?
- What happened in the case Buckley v. Valeo (1976) ?
- What was the issue and President’s Argument in the Clinton v. Jones case?
- How are Officials removed?
- What was the holding in the Morrison v. Olson (1988) case?
- What were the 3 categories on the concurrence of Jackson in the Steel Seizure Case?
- What are the Arguments against presidential immunity?
What's Your Answer to "What were the facts of Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S. (1935) case?"