Q: Give a note on the outcome of the Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case?
Discussion: the “substantive provisions” in the amendments are directed specifically at the states. It commands that it is their duty to insure that private citizens are not discriminated against. To assure that the states adhere to the provisions congress created – 5 to give them the power to enact any necessary legislation needed to enforce the amendments.
States must follow the law of the land, the Constitution if they refuses to due so their consent to being sued. Enforcement of the amendments are do not invade state immunity because the amendments are the supreme law, the Constitution, and so states must adhere to them.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to Give a note on the outcome of the Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- Give a note on CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE AND EXPAND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
- Describe the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966).
- Describe Patterson’s case of The First Amendment.
- What does Article VI of the constitution state with respect to the Power to Regulate or Affect the Economy?
- What is 11th and immunity?
- Civil Rights Cases
- What does 42 U.S.C. 1983 say?
- Describe the case of Cooper v Aaron (1958).
- What happened in the case, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
- Describe in detail the case of Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816).
What's Your Answer to "Give a note on the outcome of the Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case?"