In TN, we are not allowed to say that the non-moving party just didn’t prove an essential element of their case; we must prove with affidavits, etc. that there is not genuine issue. This court screwed up the interpretations of Celetex. The whole discussion of Celetex was dicta anyway. Byrd misstates Celetex by saying that that court focused on the nonmoving party’s response, when Celetex solely focused on the moving party. Because of this misstatement, TN doesn’t recognize the “put up or shut up” motion.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Civil Procedure Cases and are similar to What happened in Byrd v. Hall?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.