Watkins v. Sowders – not constitutionally required to conduct a hearing whether witness identified D correctly outside the presence of the jury
trend to move the docket by waiting until trial to deal with issue instead of hearing pretrial
but if done pretrial, D and P can possibly plea bargain; delaying to trial might lose negotiation
14A DP not compel it to be outside of jury’s presence
Confessions
must give Miranda rights if in police custody, otherwise admissions made by D can’t be used
only on issue of guilt or innocence
confessions can still be used to impeach the D if they take the stand (Harris v. NY); jury given limiting instructions to just used for impeachment, but come on …
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about and are similar to What happened in the case Watkins v. Sowders?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "What happened in the case Watkins v. Sowders?"