Q: What was the holding in the Carter v. Carter Coal(Coal price controls) (1936)case?
Holding – No / The employment of men the fixing of their wages hours of labor and
working conditions the bargaining in respect of these things, whether carried out
separately or together, each constitute intercourse for the purposes of production
not of trade.
Activities relating to production have only an indirect effect on commerce.
Congress can only regulate those things that have a direct effect on commerce.
Mining is not one of them.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Carter v. Carter Coal(Coal price controls) (1936)case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What are the three ways in which Congress can regulate interstate commerce?
- State the commerce clause.
- What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
- State some basic rules of Commerce clause?
- Give an introduction on the NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp (Union member firings) (1937) case?
- Why is the law unconstitutional?
- What was the holding in the NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp (Union member firings) (1937) case?
- What was the issue in the US v Darby (1941) case?
- What was the issue in the Champion v. Ames (Lottery Case) (1903)?
- What does Wagner Act of 1935/National Labor Relations Act say?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Carter v. Carter Coal(Coal price controls) (1936)case?"