Q: What was the holding in the case Alexander v. Sandoval (2001)?
Alexander v. Sandoval (2001) : No cause of action to enforce DOJ disparate impact regulation
-doesn’t matter that private right of action to enforce 601 (intentional discrimination) because we’re talking about 602
-Dissent (Stevens): question already decided because private right of action under 601 according to Cannon
-JM agrees majority interpretation is pretty bizarre
-JM – problem here is SC interpreting older legislation adopted when SC hospitable to implication of private remedies
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Constitutional Law Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the case Alexander v. Sandoval (2001)?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What is the presumption against implied right of action in federal statutes?
- What happened in the case Cannon v. University of Chicago (1979) ?
- Elaborate on Stevens’ concurrence on R.A.V. case.
- What is the Explicit cause of action?
- What was the dissent in Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman (1984) case?
- State White’s Dissent on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) case.
- What is the implicit cause of action?
- Civil Rights Cases
- What are the Pre-judgment remedies ?
- What was the opinion of the majority in the Dun & Bradstreet (1985) case?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the case Alexander v. Sandoval (2001)?"