Q: What was the holding in the case US v. Dicter?
US v. Dicter:
a. Doctor gave controlled substances by prescriptions to an addict for large sums of money.
b. He was convicted for distributing controlled substances and the jury (federal court) suspended his license. Def. claimed his license cannot be suspended b/c it is not property.
c. HELD: the state gave him a license–tangible property. Property is subject to suspension and the right to practice medicine is property, and thus can be suspended. Court dealt less with the licensing issue itself (which is governed by state law), and focuses more on the fact that the license is property.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Health Care Law Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the case US v. Dicter?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- what do you understand by Licensure?
- What were the facts in the case Loui v. Board of Medical Examiners?
- What happened in the case Guerrero-Ramirez v. TSBME?
- What does the term In re Guess mean?
- What happened in the case Levy v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners?
- What do you mean by Alternative Medicine?
- Give me a case brief on Porter v. Rosenberg.
- What does Nondelegation Doctrine say?
- What was the holding in the case University of Missouri v. Horowitz?
- What are the facts in the case Sun Ray Drive-In v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm’n ?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the case US v. Dicter?"