Q: What was the holding of the court in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992) case?
Holding: ?s have not shown the requisite actual or imminent harm. The injury in fact must be actual or imminent. Thus if the threatened harm is too far in the future, or too speculative, the “actual or imminent” element will not be satisfied, and no STANDING.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding of the court in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding and the rule in Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War (1974) case?
- What do you mean by adequate stake in controversy?
- What are the prudential requirements in adequate state in controversy?
- What was the holding in the Bennett v Spear (1997) case?
- What was the holding in the Doremus v. Bd of Education (1952) case?
- What are the general requirements of justiciability?
- What did the Other commentators state about the Brandenburg test?
- What was the holding of the court in Warth v. Seldin case?
- What were the facts and holding of Laird v. Tatum (1972) case?
- What are the basic requirements of the standing rule?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding of the court in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992) case?"