Held:  Court dismissed each claim for lack of standing.
(1)    Minorities and poor could not show that they would be able to move into the area in the absence of the ordinance.  No actual injury to ?.
(2)    Tax-payers in adjacent community could not prove injury caused by ? because the taxes were raised by their own municipality not by Penfield. Injury not caused by ?
(3)    Building contractors could not show that but for the ordinance they had a specific project that was precluded by the statute. No actual injury by ?.