Q: What was the holding in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?
Holding: When a city conditions a building permit on some “give back” by the owner, there must a “rough proportionality” between the burdens on the public that the building permit would bring about, and the benefit to the public from the give back. The trade-off requirement was an unconstitutional taking of ?’s property.
(1) The essential “nexus” requirement introduced in Nollan was satisfied:
(a) flood control
(b) reduce traffic control with bicycle path.
(2) The permit failed the new, ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY test
(a) not enough that the bicycle path could reduce traffic. The State had to show that it would reduce traffic
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What were the facts of Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?
- What was Justice Souter’s dissent in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?
- What was the holding in the Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984) case?
- What is the City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey (1999) case?
- Give me a case brief on Callejo-Tolosa v TSBME?
- Describe the Boerne v. Flores (1997) case.
- What is meant by Post pet disclosure and solicitation?
- What was Justice Steven’s dissent in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?
- What happened in the case Walker v. State?
- Describe the case of Hague (1939).
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?"