Q: What was the holding of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case to implicitly waive of sovereign immunity?
Holding: The 11th amendment does not shield the states from congress’ – 5 authority to authorize Fed court to allot private citizens money damages.
Congress can do whatever the F**k it wants under the – 5 Necessary and Proper clause found within the 14th Amendment.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case to implicitly waive of sovereign immunity?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What were the issues that came up in the Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.case?
- Give a note on CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE AND EXPAND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
- What was the holding in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819—Chief Justice Marshall) case?
- Describe the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966).
- Give an account of the Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968) case.
- What was the issue in the Leisy v. Hardin (1890) case?
- Civil Rights Cases
- What was the rule in the Leisy v. Hardin (1890) case?
- What was the rule in the Prudential Ins Co v. Benjamin (1946) case?
- What were the facts of Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War (1974) case?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding of Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer case to implicitly waive of sovereign immunity?"