Q: What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
Held: Congress may not regulate intrastate instrumentalities production –
production is not commerce. The power to regulate commerce is not a congressional
police power. Congress can regulate only those things that directly affect or are
directly a part of interstate commerce.
This case is distinguished from the Lottery case and others like it that
prohibited transportation in interstate commerce. In those cases, the interstate
transportation itself was necessary to the accomplishment of the harmful results.
Here the goods themselves are harmless. Manufacturing is purely a local activity
and as such can be subject only to local regulation.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- Outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. U.S.
- State some basic rules of Commerce clause?
- What is the “Police Power” regulations and the commerce-prohibiting technique?
- What was the dissent in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918)?
- Give a brief account of the Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. (1937) case?
- What was the holding in the Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?
- What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
- What happened in the case, United States v. E.C. Knight?
- What was the holding in the Stafford v Wallace 1922 case?
- What was the holding in the South Carolina Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros case?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?"