Q: What was the holding in the Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?
yes / the transportation of persons is commerce under the commerce clause.
Congress held hearings stating that if people are refused accommodations they will
not travel thus affecting interstate commerce. Therefore congress has the
authority to regulate transient shelters in this way under its commerce clause
powers. They also advertised interstate & got customers from interstate.
- No congressional title attached with this case.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding in the Katzenbach v. McClung (Ollie’s racist Alabama barbecue) (1964) case?
- What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
- What are the three ways in which Congress can regulate interstate commerce?
- What are the Seminal Principles of the constitution with respect to the Commerce clause?
- What was the holding in the Stafford v Wallace 1922 case?
- What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
- Outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. U.S.
- What was the holding and the rule in US v. Lopez case?
- What was the rule in Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?
- State some basic rules of Commerce clause?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?"