Q: What was the holding in the Palko v. Connecticut J.Cardoza (1937) case?
Holding: Double Jeopardy is not prohibited against the States.
Why: (1) Protection against double jeopardy is not a fundamental right only:
a. Freedom of Speech
b. Freedom of Religion
c. Freedom of the press
(2) Double jeopardy is not a “fundamental principle of liberty and justice? and “a fair and enlightened justice system remains possible without the double jeopardy provision”.
(3) State’s desire to retry ? is not cruel or vexatious.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Palko v. Connecticut J.Cardoza (1937) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What are the amendments of the constitution?
- What were the facts of the Palko v. Connecticut J.Cardoza (1937) case?
- What was the holding and the rule of Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)?
- What are the facts in the case Schilb v. Kuebel ?
- what are the clauses for Freedom of religion?
- What does the The first amendment say?
- Explain Substantive DP-
- What is The Constitution of Religion?
- What are the fundamental rights of the due process?
- What were the facts of Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Rice (1978) case?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Palko v. Connecticut J.Cardoza (1937) case?"