Q: What was the holding in the Raines v. Byrd (legislative standing) 1997 case?
Holding: Legislative does not have standing to challenge the constitutionality
of the Line Veto, they lacked personal stake. Why: (1) Although Congress
explicitly provided that members of Congress “affected by [this Act] could bring
an action, which should do away with any “prudential standing limitations”,
Congress CANNOT erase Art III standing requirements. (2) Cannot litigate an
“institutional injury”. Loss of political body-Art III.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Raines v. Byrd (legislative standing) 1997 case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding in the Bennett v Spear (1997) case?
- What do you mean by Flast taxpayer standing exception.
- What were the facts of Raines v. Byrd (legislative standing) 1997 case?
- What are the prudential requirements in adequate state in controversy?
- How can statute make generalized grievance a particularized injury?
- What is the Congressional Role in Standing?
- What is the meaning of Justiciability?
- What comes under causation?
- What is the Test for Plaintiff standing?
- What is emant by legislative veto unconstitutional?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Raines v. Byrd (legislative standing) 1997 case?"