Q: What was the holding and the Rule in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, Inc.
Holding: ?s lack standing, because the governmental action was authorized not by the Taxing and Spending Clause, by rather, by the Property clause (Art IV, §3, Cl.2). Therefore, the Flast exception to the general rule against taxpayer standing does not apply.
Rule: Today, probably only suits virtually identical to Flast (suits alleging that congressional action taken under the “Taxing and Spending” law violates the Establishment Clause) may be brought by taxpayers.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding and the Rule in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, Inc.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What are the exceptions for the Taxpayer and Citizen Standing rule?
- What was the holding and rule in US v. Richardson (1974) case?
- What is the requirement of Nexus in Flast v. Cohen case?
- What are the general requirements of justiciability?
- What was the holding in the Flast v. Cohen case?
- State Stevens’concurrence in part and dissent in part in the County of Allegheny (1989) case.
- What is the general rule based on Taxpayer and Citizen Standing ?
- State 2 rules with respect to the Proper clause in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) case?
- State Harlan-White Dissent in the Scherbert (1963)case.
- What is Souter’s Concurrence on Lee’s case?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding and the Rule in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, Inc."