Q: What was the holding in the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?
Holding: the Indian Commerce Clause does not grant congress the power to abrogate a states sovereign immunity.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was the holding in the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What were the issues that came up in the Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.case?
- Explain The Eleventh Amendment & Sovereign Immunity-
- What was the holding and the rule in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case?
- What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
- Give a brief overview of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case.
- What was the holding in the Leisy v. Hardin (1890) case?
- What does the Article I of 8 of the constitution state?
- What was the holding in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case which focussed on police power of the states?
- What was the dissent of McLean in the Cooley v. Board of Wardens case?
- Why is the law unconstitutional?
What's Your Answer to "What was the holding in the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?"