Q: How does Holmes’ “Clear and Imminent Danger” test differ from Hand’s Masses test?
Masses test: Focuses on the language of the speech only, not circumstances or proximity, to see if it directly incites violence.
2. “Clear and Imminent Danger” test: Focuses on proximity between speech and the dangerous consequences.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to How does Holmes’ “Clear and Imminent Danger” test differ from Hand’s Masses test?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What is Dave’s miscellaneous comment regarding masses?
- How is Hand’s approach different from Holmes?
- How is the Clear and Present Danger” (or “Bad Tendency”) test different from Clear and Imminent Danger” test as proposed by Dave?
- What is Holmes dissent of free speech?
- Why did Holmes vote to overturn the Postmaster’s convictions?
- How is Illegal Action advocated?
- What is Brandeis’ concurrence?
- How does Dave give his view on the Bad Tendency” test v.“Clear and Present Danger”test?
- State Dave’s contribution to the Brandeis’ concurrence.
- What was Dave’s comments on the Brandenburg case?
What's Your Answer to "How does Holmes’ “Clear and Imminent Danger” test differ from Hand’s Masses test?"