Indefiniteness
•    Morice v. Bishop of Durham
•    Thinks making charitable contribution but doesn’t create trust
•    Resulting trust FBO her estate implemented
•    To survive indefiniteness must:
-    Designate beneficiary
-    Or approved charity
•    Could also just make outright bequest
•    Morice is going to vanish
•    See Leach, n. 1, p. 576 – why didn’t bishop have power of appointment?
•    AG enforces on behalf of charities/education/religion (what about church/state distinction?!)
•    Charitable contributions/trusts escape the Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP)
•    Texas trying to eliminate RAP for everyone
•    Lefkowtiz
•    AG argues Cornell either:
-    Promised to continue research OR
-    By actions showed they would do so
•    These promises are enforceable but Court says didn’t promise
•    Get all charitable contributions clearly expressed in writing
-    E.g. “Gift subject to charitable restriction”
•    Examples:
•    To A ? outright bequest
•    To A but hope will be generous ? outright gift
•    To A but direct A to pay $200 to B per month ? outright bequest subject to mandatory charge
•    To A, in trust, to pay income to B, remainder to R ? private express trust
•    To A in trust to promote research in tort reform ? charitable trust
•    To UT for research in tort reform ? gift subject to charitable restriction
•    To UT law school