-cops see D carrying bag in high-crime area, D makes eye contact w/ cops and flees; eventually cornered; cops pat down and find gun, arrest D
-no per se rule after this case: flight in high-crime area not necessarily render reas. suspicion; indicative D may have something to hide, but must consider totality of circumstances
-S.Ct. here says reas. suspicion for seizure and pat-down that occurred w/ D cornered
Dissent (Stevens): good majority not est. a per se rule; even in this context, no reas. suspicion b/c other reasons D might be fleeing
-Sundby says only convincing one is that b/c it’s a high crime area, D may want to flee scene to prevent the crime from being pinned on him/getting involved in investigation when he’s innocent
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about and are similar to What happened in Illinois v. Wardlow (2000). Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.