Q: What was Marshall’s comment in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case which focussed on police power of the states?
Marshall conceives the Fed government’s authority to regulate commerce in Gibbons
very broadly. Seems to stop just short of saying that when Congress has not acted,
states still do not have the authority to regulate. Seems to say that Fed power to
regulate commerce is exclusive.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about and are similar to What was Marshall’s comment in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case which focussed on police power of the states?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
- State some basic rules of Commerce clause?
- Why is the law unconstitutional?
- State the commerce clause.
- What was the holding in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case which focussed on police power of the states?
- What was the holding in the Leisy v. Hardin (1890) case?
- What was the holding and the rule in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case?
- Who has the exclusive power to regulate interstate commerce?
- What were the issues that came up in the Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.case?
- What are the Seminal Principles of the constitution with respect to the Commerce clause?
What's Your Answer to "What was Marshall’s comment in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case which focussed on police power of the states?"