Q: Outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. U.S.
Congress, under the Commerce Clause, may regulate businesses local in scope, if their business
activities have some impact on interstate commerce.
Concurrence - The Commerce Clause should not be the sole justification for the Court’s opinion. The
14th Amendment may be more apt here. Individual constitutional rights should be of more importance than the interstate transportation of products
After this case, Congress’s regulatory power has been unlimited, as a result almost certainly not intended by the Constitutions’ framers.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Constitutional Law Cases and are similar to Outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. U.S.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding in the Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?
- What was the holding in the Stafford v Wallace 1922 case?
- What was the holding in the Katzenbach v. McClung (Ollie’s racist Alabama barbecue) (1964) case?
- What was the holding and the rule in US v. Lopez case?
- What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
- What are the Seminal Principles of the constitution with respect to the Commerce clause?
- What are the three ways in which Congress can regulate interstate commerce?
- Why is the law unconstitutional?
- What were the facts of United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938) case?
- What was the holding in the South Carolina Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros case?
What's Your Answer to "Outcome of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. U.S."