police arrest D and try to Mirandize him and D states he knows his rights and the police never finish the warning. They ask him if he has a gun and he tells them he has a gun in his bedroom
- -
does the pistol get suppressed as a fruit of the poisonous tree?
No. Miranda violations that lead to the finding of physical evidence are not excluded. Physical evidence is not suppressible based on a mere Miranda violation because Miranda does not protect against physical evidence, only testimonial. o Thomas (3 votes): a 5th Amendment violation occurs at trial, not when the statement is made.
Miranda is a prophylactic, not a core constitutional requirement. The gun is not a fruit, because there has not yet been a tree because we are not at trial. o Kennedy (2 votes): Reliability cost/benefits, its one thing to keep out a statement, its quite another to keep out a reliable piece of physical evidence o Dissent Souter (3 votes): the two-tier system of core violations and Miranda violations stillexists
Dissent Breyer (1 vote): thinks there should be a good faith/bad faith test to determine
whether or not the evidence should be suppressed
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about and are similar to U.S. v. Patane Summary. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "U.S. v. Patane Summary"