Q: What was Rhenquist’s rule for the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?
Rule (Rhenquist): Even when the Constitution vests in Congress complete law-making authority over a particular area, the 11th Amend restricts the judicial power under Art III, and Art I cannot be used to circumvent the constitutional limitations placed upon Fed jurisdiction. Radically new—and restricted—view of Fed power.
Citizens may not sue states based upon Article I Commerce Clause.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was Rhenquist’s rule for the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the holding in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819—Chief Justice Marshall) case?
- What was the holding and the rule in the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case?
- What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
- What does the Article III of 2 of the constitution state?
- What happened in the case, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
- What are the Seminal Principles of the constitution with respect to the Commerce clause?
- Give a brief description of the US v. Lopez (Gun Free Zone Schools Act – 1990) (1995) case?
- What were the issues that came up in the Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.case?
- State 2 rules with respect to the Proper clause in the McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) case?
- What does the Article I of 8 of the constitution state?
What's Your Answer to "What was Rhenquist’s rule for the Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) case?"