Rule: The more precise the standards/guidelines laid down by Congress, the greater the likelihood that a proper delegation of power has occurred. The more vague, the greater the likelihood of finding the delegation unconstitutional.
Judicial reluctance to intervene, particularly in disputes about executive action in foreign affairs, has been grounded in the doctrine of political questions, or concerns about justiceability:
* doctrine of ripeness and nonjusticeability has been applied to avoid judicial involvement in controversies related to the use of military force in international conflicts (Jesse Chopps, Judicial Review and the Ntl. Political Process, 1980).
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Executive Power and are similar to What was the rule in the U. S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What's Your Answer to "What was the rule in the U. S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936) case?"