a. “Until today, the Court has never upheld view-point based suppression of speech simply because that suppression was a condition upon the acceptance of public funds.”b. The Title X provision is clearly viewpoint discrimination
since it allows counseling on a wide range of family planning topics,
except abortion. And government should not be allowed to condition
funding on prohibitions of viewpoint. Clearly, the government could
not condition funding on racial discrimination.
c. The majority is returning to the “right-privilege” doctrine of the olden days.
d. The Dr./Patient relationship requires that Dr. not be prohibited from speaking about any matters if they are in the best interest of the patient.
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to State Blackmun-Marshall-Stevens Dissent.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.