Q: State Douglas’ Dissent in Part on Yoder’s case.
Douglas’ Dissent in Part
a. The majority was wrong to decide the case without determining whether each of the children involved desired to attend high school over the objections of their parents. The trial court should see if the kids want to go to school, and if they do, the Amish parents’ wishes should be overruled…
b. What’s the majority’s bullshit distinction between religion and philosophical views? This is a very tenuous distinction. Besides, in the past, we have considered conscientious objector claims to fall under “religious training and belief” in the Selective Service Act, even though the objectors may have not been religious.
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to State Douglas’ Dissent in Part on Yoder’s case.. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- State Rutledge-Frankfurter-Jackson-Burton Dissent on the Everson case.
- What was Jackson’s Dissent on the Everson case?
- What was the opinion of the majority in Everson’s case?
- What was the opinion of the majority in Yoder’s case?
- What was the opinion of the majority in Lee’s case?
- What is Souter’s Concurrence on Lee’s case?
- Elaborate on The Free Exercise Clause.
- State Kennedy-Rehnquist-White-Scalia concurrence in part and dissent in part on the case of County of Allegheny (1989).
- Elaborate on the Establishment clause.
- What is the Psychological Coercion Test?
What's Your Answer to "State Douglas’ Dissent in Part on Yoder’s case."