a.    Court may argue that a debtor has not truly relinquished control of their money, and so has ability to turn it over.  (See FTC v. Affordable Media at p 57).
b.    Court may not accept asset protection where a party has purposely relinquished control for the purpose of frustrating the court—if there is a possibility that a party will soon have a large judgment against him, this evaluation will be even worse.
c.    Self-settled trust doesn’t keep personal items from being seized.