Q: State the rule in the Wickard v. Filburn (Cumulative effect theory)(1942) case?
Rule: Congress may regulate intrastate, non-commercial activity that may have a
substantial cumultative effect on interstate commerce.
The wisdom, workability, or fairness of the plan regulation the court will have
nothing to do with. Extreme deference is given to Congress on issues of Commerce
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to State the rule in the Wickard v. Filburn (Cumulative effect theory)(1942) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What was the rule in Heart of Atlanta v. US (Racist Atlanta Hotel) (1964) case?
- What was the rule in the Katzenbach v. McClung (Ollie’s racist Alabama barbecue) (1964) case?
- State some basic rules of Commerce clause?
- What was the holding in the South Carolina Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros case?
- What is the substantial effect state.
- What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
- What happened in the case Houston, East & West Texas Railway v. U.S?
- What are the three ways in which Congress can regulate interstate commerce?
- What was the holding and the rule in US v. Lopez case?
- What is Commerce Power?
What's Your Answer to "State the rule in the Wickard v. Filburn (Cumulative effect theory)(1942) case?"