Q: Summary of Garratt v. Dailey
knew pulling chair out from under would cause result; intentional because:
(1) it is done with the purpose of causing the contact
(2) or the apprehension
(3) or with the knowledge that contact or apprehension is substantially certain to result from act
Are you a lawyer? Or, do you just knoooow the answer?
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Tort Law Cases and are similar to Summary of Garratt v. Dailey. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
Similar Legal Questions
- What happened in the case, Garratt v. Dailey?
- What are the Elements of Battery as a Physical Harm?
- What is assault?
- What are the elements of battery?
- In tort law, when is someone subject to a battery tort?
- What are the elements of assault?
- When is one liable for Assault?
- Define a Battery?
- What are the Three Factors in Res Ipsa?
- What are the Elements of Trespass to Land?
What's Your Answer to "Summary of Garratt v. Dailey"